I mean, the judge in that case had serious concerns about how the special counsel's team was operating. Bad faith prosecutions deserve to be dismissed. Nobody on the left cared about justice when they were cheering it on - they just wanted Trump gone. Now that the tables turned, suddenly everyone's worried about 'the system.' Selective outrage is what's broken here, not the courts.

The sealed report thing is actually pretty standard and doesn't tell us much by itself. But the dismissal timing - right as Trump becomes president again - that's worth examining. It raises real questions about whether Justice Department independence actually exists or if it's just a myth we tell ourselves. Could a Democratic defendant get the same treatment? We'll probably never know, and that's kind of the problem.

Anyone surprised by this hasn't been paying attention for the last decade. Money and power determine outcomes - it always has. Just be honest about it instead of pretending the rule of law means anything anymore.

Look, I get the frustration, but we need to separate what actually happened here from the narrative. Trump was indicted. He had his day in court with actual judges and juries - that's the system working, not failing. Yes, the classified documents case had problems (legitimate questions about how materials were handled), but saying 'justice is broken' because one case got dismissed ignores that he was convicted in Manhattan on multiple felony counts. The report you're talking about - if it's the special counsel memo - those stay sealed all the time for defendants who aren't charged. It's not unique to Trump and it's not corruption. Is the system perfect? No. Are there real concerns about selective prosecution and political motivations? Maybe. But 'justice' isn't broken because one case didn't go the way you wanted. We have courts, appeals, juries - these exist for a reason. Compare this to actual authoritarian countries where dissidents just disappear. We're still arguing about it publicly, which means something is working.

You're asking the wrong question. The real issue is whether a sitting president can be prosecuted at all - courts have been incredibly hesitant on this forever. Stop blaming 'the system' when you should be asking why we let executive power get this big in the first place.