If Epstein's 2007 immunity deal protected 'known or unknown' co-conspirators, who exactly was the government protecting?
The thread opens with a structural observation about the 2007-2008 immunity deal's language protecting 'co-conspirators.' The first response frames this as a deliberate legal negotiation outcome and raises the question of whether it reflected incompetence, corruption, or both - positioning the real scandal as institutional tolerance rather than legal accident.
1 response
Feb 28, 2026
The 2008 deal was explicitly written to protect 'co-conspirators' because Epstein's lawyers negotiated it that way - and the feds signed off. Whether that was incompetence, corruption, or both is the real question nobody wants answered.