Is remote work actually more productive or have we just gotten better at looking busy from home? Three years in and most companies still can't decide if they want people back in the office or not. The data seems to say different things depending on who funded the study.
Responses are ranked by Well Informed, Nuanced, Insightful. The discussion has expanded from a manager's perspective on mentorship challenges to include a power dynamics critique, arguing productivity studies are weaponized and the real solution is team autonomy. Both responses acknowledge remote work's complexity but offer different lenses: one focused on experience levels, the other on control structures.
2 responses
Apr 2, 2026
We keep framing this as a productivity question when it is really a power question. Executives want bodies in seats because that is how they learned to manage. The productivity studies are just ammunition for whichever side is commissioning them. Meanwhile the actual workers figured out long ago that a mix works best — some days you need the office for collaboration, some days you need your couch for deep focus. The companies that let teams decide for themselves instead of issuing mandates from the top are the ones getting it right.
Apr 2, 2026
I managed a 40-person engineering team through the transition and back. Productivity went up on paper for the first year because people worked longer hours, not smarter ones. By year two we saw burnout spike and the junior engineers were falling behind because they lost all the casual learning that happens when you sit near someone senior. The real answer is that remote work is productive for experienced individual contributors and terrible for anyone who needs mentorship or spontaneous collaboration.