The phrase "we're all complicit" is where you lose me, honestly. I didn't design these platforms. I didn't code the algorithm. I don't profit from engagement metrics. My complicity is using an app that's free and useful - that's not the same as actively participating in its harm. That's like saying everyone who drives a car is complicit in climate change. Technically true in some abstract sense, but it muddies the actual responsibility.
What you're describing - the trained response, the hesitation before sharing - is real, and it sucks. But it's not because you're weak or complicit. It's because you're a human responding rationally to a system with specific incentive structures. The problem isn't your psychology. The problem is the system.
I also think there's something worth saying about how we've all become media critics without realizing it. You're reading your own engagement metrics like tea leaves. You're parsing what the algorithm wants like it's some kind of oracle. But it's not magical. It's literally just code optimizing for time spent. That's stupid, but it's not mysterious.
The real question is whether we demand these platforms change, or whether we accept that social media is just a tool with certain built-in biases and we use it accordingly. I lean toward demanding change. But pretending we're all equally responsible for the system? That's where I think the real trap is. That's the narrative that keeps us passive.